Get Daffd
Work

Libra: a planning companion

Flow diagram of Libra: candidacy, balance, protocol and evidence as four connected tabs

Four tabs, one plan, as a wireframe.

Lightweight Integrated Bioregenerative Approach. B-⁠Lite with a Prepectoral BioShield Pocket, as one planning companion for candidacy, load, protocol and evidence.

Designed by me, built with a little help from AI, for Advanced Biomedical Concept. Concept, Prof. Roy De Vita. 2026, work in progress.

Problem.

Prepectoral planning means juggling candidacy, load, sequence and evidence. They lived in separate documents. A document you scroll is not a plan you can run. Libra puts all four behind one set of tabs.

Craft.

  1. Who it is for.

    ABC's team, representatives and healthcare professionals planning prepectoral cases with B-⁠Lite and the BioShield Pocket. Restricted access. Labelled work in progress on every screen.

    The Libra header with its Work in progress label, the four tabs and the planning aid notice
    Labelled work in progress, and a planning aid, not a clinical decision.

  2. Describe the case.

    Seven case parameters: implant volume and profile, flap thickness, radiotherapy, BMI band, ptosis and smoking. They roll up into a Suitability Index out of 100, with a plain label on top.

    Libra candidacy inputs beside the Suitability Index and its contributing factors
    Step 1. Describe the case, get a first read.

  3. Where the score comes from.

    No black box. Every input shows up as a contributing factor, marked as a help, a risk or a watch point. The suggested matrix configuration changes with the case, and the calculation sits one click below.

    Wireframe of the contributing factors list, each marked as helps, risk or watch, with the suggested configuration below
    Each factor is marked: helps, risk or watch.
    Libra contributing factors, suggested matrix configuration and the How the Suitability Index is calculated panel
    Step 2. The score shows its working.

  4. Weigh load against support.

    Tissue load on one side, biological support on the other. The beam tilts only when load beats support. Switch B-⁠Lite and the BioShield Pocket on or off and watch the balance move.

    Wireframe of the balance beam with tissue load and support, a target zone, B-Lite and BioShield Pocket toggles
    The beam tilts only when load beats support.
    Libra Balance Simulator with a beam weighing tissue load against biological support
    Step 3. Load versus support, as a beam.

  5. Run the sequence.

    Seven stages, from selection to refinement. Each one pairs the surgical step with its balance rationale and the ABC touchpoint. Open a stage, read it, move on.

    Libra Protocol Sequence with seven expandable stages
    Step 4. The protocol, stage by stage.

  6. Where the numbers come from.

    Two evidence streams, kept apart: the load side with B-⁠Lite, and the support side. Every figure is quoted directly from the cited publication, with its DOI. No pooled or modelled numbers.

    Wireframe of the evidence tab: load side and support side studies with DOI chips, merging into a synthesis
    Two streams, reported apart, then synthesised.
    Libra Clinical Evidence tab with the load side stream and its cited study
    Step 5. Evidence beside the plan, sources attached.

  7. Why shipping it matters.

    A draft protocol becomes a working page while the science is still moving. I design it and own the build, so the tool can change as fast as the protocol does.

    Candidacy through to evidence.

Outcome.

Live behind HCP access, listed among the site's tools, still labelled work in progress. The takeaways: the score explains itself, the beam makes load and support visible, and the evidence never blends its sources. Concept by Prof. Roy De Vita.