Work

Cost-Per-Case Calculator

Flow diagram of the Cost-per-Case Calculator: scenario, inputs, a confirm gate, then the total per case

How the model works, as a wireframe.

One model that turns ExaShape versus ADM and synthetic mesh into a clear cost of case, not a device price alone.

Designed by me, built with a little help from AI, for Advanced Biomedical Concept. 2026.

Problem.

Device price alone is the wrong number. OR time, complications, implant loss and reintervention move the total. Spreadsheets differed by who owned them. The team needed one shared model.

Craft.

  1. Who it is for.

    ABC's commercial team and representatives. Anyone who has to explain, with discipline, why ExaShape can cost less than a cheaper mesh once the full case is counted.

    Cost-per-Case Calculator inputs comparing ExaShape with ADM and synthetic mesh
    Inputs for a prepectoral case, live for ABC's team.
  2. Set the scenario.

    Toolbar first: per case or annual volume, pocketing approach, currency, and EU or Italian SSN environment. Same starting point for every conversation.

    Calculator toolbar with per-case mode, pocketing, currency and environment controls
    Step 1. Lock the scenario before you touch prices.
  3. Enter the inputs.

    Product price, OR time, complications, implant loss and reintervention for ExaShape against ADM and synthetic mesh. Sensitivity toggles and laterality keep the model honest.

    Wireframe of one comparator card: price, OR time, complication, loss and reintervention fields, each with a source chip
    Every input carries its source.
    Cost calculator input fields for ExaShape, ADM and synthetic mesh
    Step 2. The numbers that feed the model.
  4. Confirm, then see the total.

    Results stay behind Confirm before viewing results. No accidental reveal mid-meeting. The output is a case total, not a quote.

    Calculator results totals after confirm step
    Step 3. Confirm. Then the totals.
  5. Where the total comes from.

    A breakdown shows each cost line so the economic argument is transparent. Change an input, reconfirm, and the story updates.

    Wireframe of the breakdown table: one row per product, expected cost columns, total and difference versus ExaShape
    Expected costs: rate × unit cost × case units.
    Cost breakdown lines that make up the case total
    Step 4. The calculation, line by line.
  6. Why shipping it matters.

    I own the site and its builds, so an internal decision tool is a page, not a project. Same design system as the public site. One model, one answer, no spreadsheet drift.

    A full pass through the flow.

Outcome.

Live for ABC's team and representatives. One model, one page, with a confirm step before results.